|
| | SB3067 Engrossed | | LRB099 18386 SLF 42761 b |
|
|
| 1 | | AN ACT concerning the Law Enforcement Information Task |
| 2 | | Force Act.
|
| 3 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
| 4 | | represented in the General Assembly:
|
| 5 | | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Law |
| 6 | | Enforcement Information Task Force Act. |
| 7 | | Section 5. Task Force; purpose. There shall be created a |
| 8 | | Law Enforcement Information Task Force to study and make |
| 9 | | recommendations regarding criminal discovery and law |
| 10 | | enforcement information sharing. |
| 11 | | Section 10. Members. |
| 12 | |
(a) The Task Force shall consist of the following members |
| 13 | | who will not be compensated: |
| 14 | | (1) the Director of the Administrative Office of the |
| 15 | | Illinois Courts, or his or her designee; |
| 16 | | (2) the Attorney General, or his or her designee; |
| 17 | | (3) the Director of State Police, or his or her |
| 18 | | designee; |
| 19 | | (3.5) the Secretary of the Department of Innovation and |
| 20 | | Technology, or his or her designee; |
| 21 | | (4) a State's Attorney from a county with more than |
| 22 | | 3,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; |
|
| | SB3067 Engrossed | - 2 - | LRB099 18386 SLF 42761 b |
|
|
| 1 | | (5) a public defender from a county with more than |
| 2 | | 3,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; |
| 3 | | (6) a representative of the Office of the State's |
| 4 | | Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor; |
| 5 | | (7) a representative of the Office of the State |
| 6 | | Appellate Defender; |
| 7 | | (8) a representative of the Illinois State's Attorneys |
| 8 | | Association, appointed by the Governor; |
| 9 | | (9) a representative of the Illinois Public Defender |
| 10 | | Association, appointed by the Governor; |
| 11 | | (10) a representative from the Illinois Judges |
| 12 | | Association, appointed by the Speaker of the House of |
| 13 | | Representatives; |
| 14 | | (11) a representative from the Illinois State Bar |
| 15 | | Association, appointed by the Minority Leader of the House |
| 16 | | of Representatives; |
| 17 | | (12) a representative of the Chicago Bar Association, |
| 18 | | appointed by the Senate President; |
| 19 | | (13) a representative from the Illinois Sheriffs' |
| 20 | | Association, appointed by the Senate Minority Leader; |
| 21 | | (14) a representative from the Illinois Association of |
| 22 | | Chiefs of Police, appointed by the Governor; |
| 23 | | (15) the chief of police from a municipality with more |
| 24 | | than 1,000,000 residents, or his or her designee; |
| 25 | | (16) the sheriff from a county with more than 3,000,000 |
| 26 | | residents, or his or her designee; and |
|
| | SB3067 Engrossed | - 3 - | LRB099 18386 SLF 42761 b |
|
|
| 1 | | (17) the Director of the Illinois Criminal Justice |
| 2 | | Information Authority, or his or her designee. |
| 3 | | (b) The Law Enforcement Information Task Force shall be |
| 4 | | established within the Illinois Criminal Justice Information |
| 5 | | Authority and the Illinois Criminal Justice Information |
| 6 | | Authority shall serve as the technology and policy advisor to |
| 7 | | assist the Task Force. The Illinois Criminal Justice |
| 8 | | Information Authority shall work with State and local criminal |
| 9 | | justice agencies to promote information sharing systems |
| 10 | | through its access to technical expertise and its grant-making |
| 11 | | powers for technology information projects. The Illinois |
| 12 | | Criminal Justice Information Authority shall provide staff to |
| 13 | | serve as a liaison between the Law Enforcement Information Task |
| 14 | | Force and its stakeholders to provide guidance in criminal |
| 15 | | justice information sharing, best practices and strategies, |
| 16 | | and to effectuate the mission of the Task Force. |
| 17 | | (c) The members of the Task Force shall elect a chair of |
| 18 | | the Task Force. The chair of the Task Force shall convene the |
| 19 | | first meeting of the Task Force on or before August 31, 2016. |
| 20 | | The Task Force shall meet at least twice a month thereafter |
| 21 | | until it completes its duties under this Act, or until December |
| 22 | | 31, 2016, whichever is earlier. |
| 23 | | Section 15. Duties of the Task Force.
|
| 24 | | (a) The Task Force may consult with experts to provide |
| 25 | | assistance as necessary. |
|
| | SB3067 Engrossed | - 4 - | LRB099 18386 SLF 42761 b |
|
|
| 1 | | (b) The Task Force shall: |
| 2 | | (1) analyze the criminal discovery process in this |
| 3 | | State to determine the actual costs, including, but not |
| 4 | | limited to, labor, materials, time, and other tangible |
| 5 | | costs of the current criminal discovery process to |
| 6 | | determine how technology can improve the process for all |
| 7 | | participants; |
| 8 | | (2) analyze the process for information sharing, |
| 9 | | including, but not limited to, an analysis of record |
| 10 | | management systems, computer aided dispatch systems, and |
| 11 | | other technology used to process information between law |
| 12 | | enforcement agencies in this State to determine the actual |
| 13 | | costs of the current process; |
| 14 | | (3) analyze the current information sharing process |
| 15 | | between law enforcement agencies to determine how |
| 16 | | technology can improve the process for all participants; |
| 17 | | (4) determine which prosecutors' offices obtain all |
| 18 | | law enforcement discoverable evidence in an electronic |
| 19 | | format, which prosecutors' offices will soon be able to |
| 20 | | obtain all law enforcement discoverable evidence in an |
| 21 | | electronic format, and which prosecutors' offices will not |
| 22 | | have that ability at any point in the future without |
| 23 | | assistance; |
| 24 | | (5) determine the barriers for those prosecutors' |
| 25 | | offices that will not be able to obtain law enforcement |
| 26 | | discoverable evidence in an electronic format without |
|
| | SB3067 Engrossed | - 5 - | LRB099 18386 SLF 42761 b |
|
|
| 1 | | assistance; |
| 2 | | (6) determine which law enforcement agencies obtain |
| 3 | | and utilize data entirely, or partially, in an electronic |
| 4 | | format, which law enforcement agencies will soon be able to |
| 5 | | obtain and utilize data entirely in an electronic format, |
| 6 | | and which law enforcement agencies will not be able to |
| 7 | | obtain and utilize data entirely in an electronic format at |
| 8 | | any point in the future without assistance; |
| 9 | | (7) study how a single statewide criminal information |
| 10 | | sharing system or other technology may improve electronic |
| 11 | | discovery or electronic redaction; |
| 12 | | (8) study how a statewide standardized law enforcement |
| 13 | | reporting form that can be easily redacted may improve the |
| 14 | | criminal discovery process; |
| 15 | | (9) study the short-term needs for law enforcement |
| 16 | | agencies and State's Attorneys to facilitate greater use of |
| 17 | | electronic discovery and information sharing; |
| 18 | | (10) study whether a single standardized statewide |
| 19 | | case record management system or other law enforcement |
| 20 | | technology would provide better and additional access to |
| 21 | | information for law enforcement; |
| 22 | | (11) determine whether a single standardized statewide |
| 23 | | case record management system or other electronic |
| 24 | | discovery technology would provide for a better and more |
| 25 | | efficient criminal discovery process and offer any cost |
| 26 | | savings; |
|
| | SB3067 Engrossed | - 6 - | LRB099 18386 SLF 42761 b |
|
|
| 1 | | (12) determine whether a single standardized statewide |
| 2 | | case record management system or other information sharing |
| 3 | | technology would provide for a better and more efficient |
| 4 | | law enforcement information sharing process and offer any |
| 5 | | cost savings; |
| 6 | | (13) suggest an alternative funding process to the |
| 7 | | State's current method to pay for criminal discovery costs; |
| 8 | | (14) suggest an alternative funding process to the |
| 9 | | State's current method to pay for law enforcement |
| 10 | | information sharing costs; |
| 11 | | (15) determine which executive branch agency, judicial |
| 12 | | branch agency, or quasi-governmental organization is best |
| 13 | | suited to serve as a conduit and coordinator for a |
| 14 | | statewide criminal electronic discovery system; and |
| 15 | | (16) determine which executive branch agency, judicial |
| 16 | | branch agency, or quasi-governmental organization is best |
| 17 | | suited to serve as a conduit and coordinator for a |
| 18 | | statewide criminal information sharing system. |
| 19 | | Section 20. Preliminary and final report. |
| 20 | | (a) The Task Force shall provide a preliminary report to |
| 21 | | the Governor and General Assembly on or before December 15, |
| 22 | | 2016, if the final report is not completed by then. |
| 23 | | (b) The Task Force shall issue a final report to the |
| 24 | | Governor and General Assembly on or before January 15, 2017. |
| 25 | | The report shall include recommendations for legislation, use |