|
| | HB2750 Engrossed | | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
|
| 1 | | AN ACT concerning cannabis.
|
| 2 | | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
|
| 3 | | represented in the General Assembly:
|
| 4 | | Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the |
| 5 | | Cannabis Study Act. |
| 6 | | Section 5. Findings.
|
| 7 | | (a) Numerous localities throughout this State impose a |
| 8 | | civil fine for the possession of cannabis. The states of |
| 9 | | Alaska, California, Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, |
| 10 | | Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont |
| 11 | | impose civil fines, based on specified low gram quantities of |
| 12 | | cannabis. On August 29, 2013 the U.S. Department of Justice |
| 13 | | issued a "Guidance Regarding Marijuana Enforcement" Memorandum |
| 14 | | for all United States Attorneys reaffirming that "the |
| 15 | | Department of Justice has not historically devoted resources |
| 16 | | for prosecuting individuals whose conduct is limited to |
| 17 | | possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use on |
| 18 | | private property". |
| 19 | | (b) A majority of voters in the states of Alaska (2014), |
| 20 | | Oregon (2014), Colorado (2012), and Washington (2012) |
| 21 | | legalized the possession of cannabis by any person 21 years of |
| 22 | | age or older, and tax and regulate cannabis in a manner similar |
| 23 | | to alcohol. Despite existing federal law prohibitions |
|
| | HB2750 Engrossed | - 2 - | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
|
| 1 | | regarding the purchase and possession of cannabis, on August |
| 2 | | 29, 2013, the U.S. Attorney General publicly stated that the |
| 3 | | Department of Justice would allow Washington and Colorado to |
| 4 | | create a system that would regulate and implement legalization |
| 5 | | of the use of cannabis for adults. |
| 6 | | (c) Numerous polls, including a 2013 Pew Research Center |
| 7 | | poll found that a majority of Americans favor legalizing the |
| 8 | | use of cannabis, with an 11 point rise since 2010. |
| 9 | | (d) During the 42 years since the enactment of the Cannabis |
| 10 | | Control Act, attitudes in this State regarding the use of |
| 11 | | cannabis have changed; Public Act 98-122, the Compassionate Use |
| 12 | | of Medical Cannabis Pilot Program Act, of the 98th General |
| 13 | | Assembly, authorized physicians to prescribe cannabis for |
| 14 | | therapeutic use in patients suffering from certain types of |
| 15 | | medical conditions. |
| 16 | | (e) It is appropriate for this State to consider the |
| 17 | | regulation and taxing of cannabis, in a manner similar to |
| 18 | | alcohol and tobacco, for individuals 21 years of age or older. |
| 19 | | (f) If the General Assembly wishes to consider regulating |
| 20 | | and taxing cannabis, in a manner similar to alcohol or tobacco, |
| 21 | | for individuals 21 years of age or older, that decision should |
| 22 | | be based upon facts which establish that the regulation and |
| 23 | | taxation of cannabis is in the best interest of the people of |
| 24 | | the State of Illinois.
|
| 25 | | Section 10. Regulation and taxation of cannabis in a manner |
|
| | HB2750 Engrossed | - 3 - | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
|
| 1 | | similar to alcohol and tobacco for individuals over 21 years of |
| 2 | | age or older.
|
| 3 | | (a) Before considering regulation and taxation of cannabis |
| 4 | | in a manner similar to alcohol and tobacco for individuals over |
| 5 | | 21 years of age or older, the General Assembly shall direct the |
| 6 | | Sentencing Policy Advisory Council to: |
| 7 | | (1) determine the effect regulation and taxation would |
| 8 | | have on law enforcement resources; |
| 9 | | (2) determine the impact regulation would have on the |
| 10 | | rate of arrests, predisposition detention, and sentencing;
|
| 11 | | (3) review approaches a cannabis regulation law could |
| 12 | | take regarding drug-free workplace policies and procedures |
| 13 | | and what effect the different approaches would have;
|
| 14 | | (4) determine the effect regulation and taxation would |
| 15 | | have on existing criminal laws, including the Cannabis |
| 16 | | Control Act;
|
| 17 | | (5) review approaches states have taken to reduce risks |
| 18 | | associated with the operation of motor vehicles by |
| 19 | | individuals impaired by intoxicants including but not |
| 20 | | limited to cannabis, and what effect the different |
| 21 | | approaches have had on rates of fatalities;
|
| 22 | | (6) determine to what extent the taxation and |
| 23 | | regulation of cannabis may generate employment and revenue |
| 24 | | in this State if at all;
|
| 25 | | (7) determine the regulatory and taxing system needed |
| 26 | | for the licensing of entities to sell cannabis and the |
|
| | HB2750 Engrossed | - 4 - | LRB099 07715 RLC 27848 b |
|
|
| 1 | | licensing of entities to grow cannabis;
|
| 2 | | (8) determine the product labeling, quality control, |
| 3 | | and taxing regulations needed;
|
| 4 | | (9) compare the health effects of cannabis, alcohol, |
| 5 | | and prescription drugs on the individual and community as |
| 6 | | it relates to violence, risk-taking, addiction, cancer, |
| 7 | | overdose, and mortality;
|
| 8 | | (10) determine the impact that existing laws on |
| 9 | | cannabis possession have on rates of crime and violence; |
| 10 | | and
|
| 11 | | (11) any other relevant analysis regarding the impact |
| 12 | | on the public safety and welfare of the citizens of this |
| 13 | | State.
|
| 14 | | (b) The Illinois Sentencing Policy Advisory Council shall |
| 15 | | report to the General Assembly its findings on or before |
| 16 | | December 20, 2015. |
| 17 | | Section 15. Scope and partnership. The Illinois Sentencing |
| 18 | | Policy Advisory Council shall consider factors and work in |
| 19 | | conjunction with, and obtain input from, any individual, |
| 20 | | agency, association, and research institution, deemed |
| 21 | | appropriate by the Council.
|